Sunday before service started I told Nate Noonen that the sermon was hard for me, hard in the preparation. I told him it was harder for me than the words appeared to me on the page after I’d written it.
Usually I try to move beyond a sermon when it’s over. I know that many preachers find this difficult, even if by virtue of our work we, simply, have to go off to the next thing. I learned from Dallas Willard how important and ministry nurturing it can be to move along, to keep going, and to not get stuck in a sermon.
It can be a tempting thing to linger over what we say as preachers. Aside from our easy proclivity to esteem ourselves, we can also lose sight of the purpose of the sermon. It’s purpose is, in part, to move people to action.
Lingering and action contrast. The best sermons are worth lingering over, returning to, hearing again, and they somehow move us to act, to be in the world, and to be different in the world.
For me, moving beyond Sunday’s sermon has proven particularly difficult. I invited the church, our intentionally multiethnic church, to listen to and learn from the life of Hannah, a sister in the first testament who spent years asking God to remember her, asking God for a son. Most of us don’t embrace the real experience of waiting while asking for the same thing. I personally find it’s more efficient to keep going. Especially in terms of injustice and other topics that prove our country’s lack of growth, conception, and productivity.
As part of the sermon, I gave a few names of people that I think our church folks would be tutored by in our work of reconciliation. These people “came up before me” during my sermon preparation the weeks prior. They aren’t, by any means, an attempt at a longer treatment of the question. Of course this was in the same message that I offered my personal and hard questions about why that ministry of reconciliation is even important and how hard it is despite its biblical relevance. Hannah is answering some of my personal questions these days.
My brother, David, has offered a wonderful resource on the topic and related themes of reconciliation in the form of an annotated bibliography. You need to read it here.
At Nate’s request, here are those names of people I mentioned. I characterized them as contemporary renderings of 1 Samuel 1-2, fully realizing that these folks themselves would use other words to describe their work. Thanks for asking, Nate Noonen.
- The writings and work of Audre Lorde whose poem, New York City, I read as a contemporary version of our scriptural passage (1 Samuel 1:1-20)
- The writings and work of Peggy McIntosh
- The writings and work of Patricia Leary
- The writings and work of Tim Wise
- The writings and work of Ida B. Wells
- The writings and work of bell hooks
- The revolutionary suicide post on Dr. Melissa Harris Perry’s blog was to be my second contemporary version of the text but I didn’t have the time to include it; it’s here.
Below are just some of the notes I took during your sermon… which go into my journal to remind me in the future how to teach myself and my children what it means to be Godly. Thank you for your efforts, they point my wanting soul to the food it needs to live.
“Sometimes we get what we asked for, sometimes we have to gaze into the waiting time to see what else we’ve received.”
“Prayer is the discovery of what God has for us. The answer he gives us when we’re waiting for that one answer we’ve asked for.”
“I don’t like to lose. But I will quit before I lose.” (preach)
“Honesty is about being critical without malice.”
“You can be ‘real’ without telling anybody what you know. In order to be honest, you have to actually communicate.”
“The priest doesn’t have the Gospel in this text, the wanting mother does.”
Kimmy, you make a preacher proud. Thanks for listening and taking things in so much.